Latest News

Democrats take legal action against Georgia election board

Three Democrats have asked a state court to force Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) to take up their ethics complaints accusing three members of the State Election Board of holding an illegal meeting and overstepping their legal authority by passing rules that critics say will sow chaos and uncertainty in the presidential race.

The Democrats filed a petition late Tuesday in Fulton County Superior Court claiming that Kemp is required to hold hearings on the matters and to remove the board members if he finds they violated state law.

“We have a board that appears to be running amok, and we have one avenue, the governor, for removing them in instances when they are breaking the law,” said Cathy Woolard, a former chairwoman of the Fulton County Board of Registration & Elections. “We simply must take this action in order to attempt to force him to do his job.”

At issue are three avowed supporters of former president Donald Trump who in May took control of the five-member state election board and immediately began passing a flurry of rules that prompted an uproar of criticism from state and local election officials and from Republicans and Democrats.

One of the rules allows county boards to launch “reasonable inquiries” before certifying their results if they believe irregularities occurred. Critics say the rule could empower rogue county boards not to certify their results and would most certainly encourage mistrust in the presidential outcome.

Another rule, approved Friday, requires all counties to hand-count the number of ballots cast in each precinct on election night or the following day.

The offices of Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and Attorney General Chris Carr, both Republicans, have come out against the rules. Carr’s office issued an opinion stating that the election board had overstepped its authority by passing rules that go beyond what state law allows. The rules are “likely the precise type of impermissible legislation that agencies cannot do,” the memo stated.

Also at issue is a July 12 meeting of the state board attended only by the three pro-Trump members, about which Woolard filed an ethics complaint claiming that the meeting was not properly advertised in advance and did not feature an in-person quorum. Board staff also advised the board members that the meeting had not been properly noticed.

Kemp has taken no action on the complaints except to seek advice from Carr, whose office issued an opinion saying that state law is ambiguous about what constitutes a “formal” ethics complaint, which state law says must be investigated.

“This is political cover for him,” said state Sen. Nabilah Islam Parkes (D), who also filed an ethics complaint and is a party to the legal petition filed in court Tuesday. “He doesn’t want to engage in this, I think because he will get blowback from Donald Trump.”

A Kemp spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

You May Also Like

Investing

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, 81, defended President Biden, 80, against voter critiques that he lacks the energy and vigor to continue leading the United...

Investing

Political advisers to both President Biden and Vice President Harris were reportedly annoyed with Democrat California Gov. Gavin Newsom over a planned debate with...

Editor's Pick

By the IoT Analytics team. A new report from IoT Analytics highlights eight notable trends helping to advance and promote digital twins. Four of...

Stock

A second delivery driver has died in Texas amid record-high temperatures, just as the regulation of workplace heat safety enters a new legal limbo...

Disclaimer: thefreedomright.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2020-2024 The Freedom Right. All Rights Reserved